Summary: There’s no clear evidence that dogs need a “cortisol vacation” of 24-72 hours. The existing scientific literature does point to high cortisol levels impacting learning and stress, but the way that stress is processed by a dog’s body is actually linked to a variety of different hormones, and varies between individuals. Instead of asserting that all dogs need a cortisol vacation, behavior consultants should encourage clients to observe their dog’s behavior. If a temporary change in environment to minimize stress is recommended, there should be a clearly defined time period, and a system to track the dog’s behavior.
The dog training community is full of information, rules, and guidelines that have been passed from trainer to trainer, even from generation to generation. In the past, this was an effective way of passing knowledge between trainers and on to clients, based on what seemed to work at the time. Today, however, as information becomes more available and shareable, we must ensure that we critically assess information and the evidence to be confident that we are providing our clients and their dogs with the most up-to-date, most accurate information possible. At the same time, no matter how much knowledge we gain, we must remember to pay attention to and treat the dog in front of us, rather than giving in to the temptation to overextend conclusions from research and potentially create incorrect or misinformed rules to guide us. We must also be willing to recognize that information that we previously knew to be true may very well be proved to be inaccurate or incomplete as further research is done. To quote from one of my current favourite books, Burnout, “Research is the ongoing process of learning new things that show us a little more of what’s true, which inevitably reveals how wrong we used to be, and it is never ‘finished’.”1 This is exactly what makes being a science-based trainer so exciting and why we must constantly be learning, questioning, and researching methods we use and guidelines we follow.
An example of a relatively common guideline that I’d like to focus on is the “cortisol vacation” that has been circulating for years. Many trainers recommend and advocate for a cortisol vacation: a period of time (from a couple of days to several weeks or months) for perceived stressors to be removed from the lives of stressed dogs to allow their stress hormones (namely, of course, cortisol) to return to normal. I myself have advocated for and implemented such cortisol vacations in the past and quoted the information that it takes 24-72 hours for stress hormones to normalize. It wasn’t until earlier this year when I had hoped to cite some of this information that I found I was unable to find any evidence that this information is based on scientific findings. (Cue cortisol spike on my part!) So much is yet unknown about how mammals’ bodies react to stress, and so many answers start with that ever frustrating phrase of “it depends”; however, there have been a number of studies that provide us with enough information that we should, at the very least, question the cortisol vacation as a hard and fast rule and attempt to better define and understand it if we are going to continue to utilize it.
The general theory behind the current cortisol vacation strategy is sound. It is common knowledge that it is difficult for an animal to learn when they are overwhelmed with stress, that prolonged stress has a negative impact on the body, and that it may be necessary to remove one or more stressors from a dog’s life for a period of time. However, it is time for us to check the claims made by proponents of the cortisol vacation against the evidence that is currently available to us and refine the definition and guidelines of it. Recommending a cortisol vacation because it’s the rule shouldn’t be seen as best practice for a multitude of reasons. Aside from the practical impossibilities of continuously measuring stress hormone levels to determine the level of stress a dog is experiencing, stress hormone levels are not a good single metric when considering a dog’s welfare. The stress response is incredibly complicated and also remarkably well-regulated by the body itself in the majority of individuals. Some stress hormones (epinephrine and norepinephrine, for example) are designed to enter and exit the bloodstream very quickly.2 Other hormones are designed to act over a longer period of time, although we should be careful as to how we define “longer term.” Cortisol, for example, has been shown to leave a dog’s system 30 to 60 minutes following a stressor.3,4 As we begin to look at longer-term stress and its effects on the body, the immune system becomes involved, adding another level of complexity. To complicate things even further, individuals respond differently to stressors and to stress-related hormones.4,5 Finally, cortisol levels in blood and saliva may decline over time, even if the dog is exposed to chronic stress.6 It is also important to note that cortisol is involved in regulating many bodily activities outside of the stress response and that you will notice varying levels throughout the day, such as in the morning, following meals7 and even after events that can be termed as positive stress (for example, after time spent at a dog park).8 Because we cannot tell how high a dog’s cortisol levels are based on how they are behaving, the key to helping these dogs is not to strive to reduce stress hormones but instead to identify and remove the stressor itself and to teach the dog how to cope moving forward. Additionally, because of the intricacies of the stress response, we must be incredibly careful to not mistakenly oversimplify and overextend the information.
And so, with this in mind, how do we adapt our treatment of stressed dogs? Instead of assigning our clients the arbitrary task of lowering their dog’s stress hormones with the undefined cortisol vacation, there are more tangible, more scientifically backed steps that we can take with our clients to better help their dogs.
Educate our clients on how their dog communicates and what their dog’s body language is saying, especially in regards to what the dog finds stressful. I worry that too often we throw out tidbits of information to our clients regarding canine communication as we rush to get to the meat and potatoes of actually working on a problem behaviour or implementing an arbitrary, traditional “rule,” when an in depth, intensive study into canine communication would prove more helpful. The key point to stopping the stress cycles is to identify and remove the stressor. If our clients are able to understand how their dog communicates and accurately recognize these signs of stress, they’ll be better prepared to remove their dog from stressful situations and/or remove the stressors from their dog’s life and prevent these cycles from even beginning. Because different dogs communicate in different ways,6 observing and identifying the client’s dog’s specific communication style is crucial.
Decide with the client whether a cortisol vacation is necessary, and clearly define it for each dog. Personally, I’d even go so far as avoiding calling this a cortisol vacation and would lean toward calling it something along the lines of a “trigger avoidance plan” to be clear about the exact goal that you and the client are working toward. This plan should be based on the individual dog that you are working with and the definition may even vary throughout the time that you spend with the dog. Perhaps a dog-reactive dog’s trigger avoidance plan is simply avoiding walks at times and along routes where they see other dogs. Perhaps a dog who is displaying more generalized stress needs to have a more restrictive plan in place where additional possible stressors (car rides, dog park, etc.) are removed. Whatever plan we develop with our clients, it must remain focused on the dog in front of us and we must remain open to adjusting the plan as needed.
Based on the dog’s initial behaviour, develop a tracking system for the clients to utilize. Not only will this help the clients accurately see the progress that their dog is making, but it will help determine whether the trigger avoidance plan is helping and when it can be changed and/or ceased. How and when we progress through the plan must be based on the individual dog rather than a commonly recommended timeline.
Consider whether it is possible to increase the availability of choice and control to our clients’ dogs. The idea of providing dogs with choice and control in varying situations is not a new one, although we are seeing it morph into different versions as time progresses. We’ve seen this in the transition from applied behaviour analysis (Friedman) to The Bucket Game (Patel) to Bond-Based Choice Training (Jennifer Arnold). The idea and practice of giving dogs choice and control in their lives is not simply based on a nice ideal, but rather has been backed up by numerous studies over an extensive period of time. In a 1983 study, dogs who had control over shocks that were administered experienced fewer negative side effects than dogs who had no control. Additionally, dogs who experienced the shock following a predictor (i.e., a sound) experienced fewer negative effects.9 Beerda et al. echoed these findings in 1997.4
Consider the addition of a dog-appropriate and even breed-appropriate outlet for stress. Interestingly, additional studies have shown the benefits of having an outlet for stress and frustration.11 Instead of only removing stressors from a dog’s life, giving them an outlet for stress that they experience can be incredibly helpful. In a study on rats subjected to a series of low-grade shocks, Jay Weiss discovered the rat to be significantly less stressed if, after the shock, it was able to gnaw on a piece of wood, run on a wheel, or eat or drink something, or incidentally, if given the opportunity to bite another rat.11 Anecdotally, I think we all know how much better we feel after the opportunity to throw something or to take part in strenuous exercise or even to shout or yell when we are feeling stressed or upset. For dogs, we might consider encouraging them to release stress by shaking a stuffed toy, playing a round of tug, or sprinting for a couple of hundred metres. By showing our dogs that they have a reliable stress release that they can turn to, we are both inviting them and training them how to destress as they need to.
Enlist extra help. If, after all possible stressors have been removed from the dog’s life, they are still displaying signs of unusually high stress, it is time to contact a veterinary behaviourist for additional assistance. Unfortunately for some dogs, the body requires assistance regulating stress and hormones. For some animals, no amount of reduction of stressors for any period of time will provide this regulation; for others, any return to the minimal stressors of everyday life will prove too much. Fortunately, awareness of this has increased and we are seeing more and more options being introduced and advocated for in the veterinary world.
The current cortisol vacation provides a good framework and starting point as part of a larger behaviour plan, but it needs to be defined and explained accurately and adjusted as additional information becomes available to us. Further, we must be so careful when quoting unbacked evidence, such as the common claims that it takes 24-72 hours for stress hormones to regulate or that chronically stressed dogs require four to six weeks to “detox” from stress. As seen above, the stress response is incredibly complicated, and these statements are far too generalized and lack the necessary evidence for us to pass them on to our clients. Most importantly, it is our job to treat the dog in front of us and adapt our methods and techniques based on what they need, rather than relying on prescribed “rules” that have been passed down through the industry. We as trainers are navigating an interesting and unregulated world of science, old wives’ tales and plain old falsehoods all mixed together and being presented as fact. It is our duty to our clients and to their dogs to remain skeptical and to demand and search for evidence for every claim, whether it is for a product, a training method, or an ideology. Only then will we dispel the myths and move forward having made decisions based on scientific evidence and facts.
References
- Nagoski, A and Nagoski, E. (2020) Burnout: The Secret to Unlocking the Stress Cycle. NY: Ballantine
- Sapolsky, R. M. (1994). Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers: A Guide to Stress, Stress-related Diseases, and Coping. NY: W.H. Freeman.
- Vincent, I.C., Michell, A.R. (1992) Comparison of cortisol concentrations in saliva and plasma of dogs. Research in Veterinary Science 53:3, 342-345.
- Beerda, B., et al (1997). Behavioural, saliva cortisol and heart rate responses to different types of stimuli in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58:3-4, 365-381.
- Mormède, P. et al (2007). Exploration of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare. Physiology and Behavior 92:3, 317-339.
- Hekman, J., Karas, A., Sharp, C. (2014). Psychogenic stress in hospitalized dogs: Cross species comparisons, implications for healthcare, and the challenges of evaluation. Animals 4:2, 331-347.
- Godoy, L., et al (2018). A comprehensive overview on stress neurobiology: Basic concepts and clinical implications. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 12.
- Stephens, M. (2012). Stress and the HPA Axis : Role of glucocorticoids in alcohol dependence. Alcohol Research Current Reviews 34:4, 468-483.
- Dess, N. K., et al (1983). Immediate and proactive effects of controllability and predictability on plasma cortisol responses to shocks in dogs. Behavioral Neuroscience, 97(6), 1005–1016.
- Weiss, J. M. (1971). Effects of coping behavior in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 77(1), 1–13.
Luisa Depta is the owner of Ascent Animal Training and lives in Calgary, Alberta with her husband, three dogs, turtle, hedgehog, and poison dart frogs. Luisa is a professional behavior consultant with a special interest in working with fearful animals and a passion for sharing her knowledge through writing. Follow Ascent Animal Training here on Instagram and here on Facebook to learn more.
SHARE
Mike is an emerging animal behaviorist sitting in Minnesota in the US. He carries an MSc in social science research methods (U. of Kentucky) and brings a passion for understanding how the methods we favor shape the knowledge we privilege. Coming from careers in teaching and non-profit program evaluation, he found companion animal behavior by accident helping anxious feline friends in a unique shelter in Ohio. It is a privilege and a joy to combine these and advance the journal in this exciting time of growth.
Alexandra is a certified dog behavior consultant and holds a PhD in neuroscience. She has spent over a decade in academic research and is author of numerous scientific articles on different aspects of brain development, including olfaction, neurogenesis, and memory formation. Her work as a behavior consultant focuses on creating trusting relationships between humans and their dogs through communication, respect, and science-based knowledge. Alexandra is very dedicated to promoting more science within the dog training world. She supports dog guardians and professionals to build a solid understanding of scientific principles and provides guidance on how to apply these to life with dogs. She runs Canine Mindscape in Alicante, Spain.
I’m an Argentinean-Italian dog trainer and CSAT who spent eight amazing years in Brazil learning and working with dogs. Now based in Europe, I volunteer with the IAABC as a translator and, in my free time, help rehomed dogs settle into their new families. I love bridging languages—and hearts—between people and their dogs.
I’m a translator, editor and journalist, as well as canine educator for children and families, specialized in canine body language. I am part of the IAABC Family since 2019, as Language Director at the IAABC and Translators Team Lead at the IAABC Foundation, at the moment. I volunteer at local shelters and promote bite prevention and animal welfare at schools and events all over my country, Uruguay.
I’m a Chilean veterinarian and certified dog trainer, based in Madrid and working at a veterinary clinic. I’ve been volunteering with the IAABC and the IAABC Foundation for over seven years. In my free time, I help dogs and their guardians strengthen their bond, and I love spending quality time with my own dogs.
Master’s Degree in Natural Sciences, with a strong interest in environmental sustainability and the protection of natural ecosystems. Passionate about writing and science communication, she collaborates with multidisciplinary teams on research projects, such as Equine International, and with non-profit initiatives in the environmental and cultural fields. She is writing for different magazines, including IAABC Foundation. Her major goal is to improve horse’s welfare through behaviour research and empirical practice.
Adrienne Hovey is the copy editor for the IAABC Foundation journal and the owner of
I believe that knowledge from a wide range of disciplines fosters a more empathetic, curious, and engaging world. I am passionate about social, environmental, and minority rights issues (both human and non-human), and this has invariably led me down the road of multi-species anthropology. Perpetually curious about the world we live in, I hope to contribute towards making the world a kinder place for all of us earthlings to live on!
Beckie Wheldon is based in England, UK, and has been supporting the IAABC Foundation Journal team as a volunteer journal content editor since early 2025. She has a BSc (Hons) Animal Behaviour and Welfare, and has recently completed a MSc Clinical Animal Behaviour. With a passion for both practical and theory, Beckie is proud to be a part of the journal submission journey and support the process of applied animal behaviour information and research getting from our writers to the readers. As her full-time career, Beckie is currently part of the UK veterinary charity, PDSA, as a Learning and Development Business Partner for Veterinary, where she supports the professional development of people in their Veterinary Hospitals. Her last position was with the rescue charity, Dogs Trust, as a Canine Behavioural Welfare Manager, where she worked on embedding evidence-based behavioural welfare best practices throughout policy and practices, with both internal and external professional stakeholders, such as the police and military. With a varied background in kennels, caregiver education, and charity dog training classes, Beckie is also an accredited Animal Training Instructor (APDT UK) and an Associate Clinical Animal Behaviourist (APBC).
Erin Jones, PhD, IAABC-ADT, CDBC, CPDT-KA, CANZ-ATI, CANZ-ABC, is the Journal Director of the IAABC Foundation Journal. She holds a PhD in Human–Animal Studies, an MSc in Anthrozoology, a PG Dip in Animal Welfare, and a BSc (Hons) in Anthropology and Psychology. An international presenter, editor, writer and mentor, Erin’s writing bridges research and practice with a focus on the intersection of philosophy, ethics and dog-centered behaviour practice. She is the author of Constructing Canine Consent and co-editor of Topics in Non/Human Coexistence and numerous academic and trade journal publications.